1 of 1 people found this helpful
The expression looks good, the problem is that on a given contact record, the reference to contsupp.mergecodes is not specific enough. What if there are 35 contsupp records associated with the contact? Which mergecodes value should be evaluated by the expression?
Try to stick to contact1, contact2 and &-macros in your expressions to get consistent results.
I had the feeling that cs.mergecodes has so many implications that without a complete SQL query filter my idea can't work.
Then the problem is how to replicate in real time in a contact1 custom field the cs.mergecodes of the primary email address of the focused contact.
You mention &-macros: are you meaning Goldmine macros?